The Duty of “No” – in 50 Films
By Bruce M. Hennes
Leaders and professionals do not ultimately answer to a client, a boss, or a paycheck. They answer to the law, and, just as importantly, to the ethical obligations that come with authority and trust. That promise is easy to recite in a conference room during a presentation and much harder to honor when keeping it means lost business, angry colleagues, or the quiet exile that comes with saying “no” when everyone else is saying “go.”
The films attached to this article avoid tales of perfect heroes in tidy circumstances. Instead, it highlights people standing at the edge of that precipice, confronted with unlawful orders, corrupt customs or convenient evasions, and choosing, at great cost, to do what is right rather than what is easy.
Every businessperson understands, at least in the abstract, that employees are not merely permitted but obliged to refuse illegal commands. That principle is now so ingrained in modern compliance culture that it is taught as a basic tenet of professional identity and organizational responsibility. Less comfortably, the same is true of leaders, advisors, attorneys and accountants. A person asked to help conceal evidence, to submit information known to be false, to manipulate process to punish a critic, or to lend credibility – a title, a credential, a signature – to a plainly unlawful scheme is not just allowed but instead, expected to refuse and, when necessary, to escalate, withdraw, resign or report. The excuse that “I was only following instructions” has no more legitimacy in the executive suite than it does on the battlefield.
These films, viewed together, form a kind of unofficial ethics casebook. In courtrooms from To Kill a Mockingbird to Michael Clayton and The Verdict, lawyers and would-be lawyers face the moment when their professional skills could be used either to vindicate the law or to weaponize it. In stories like Serpico, Dark Waters, A Civil Action, and The Insider, non-lawyer professionals face their own versions of the same choice: remain silent and safe inside a powerful institution, or speak up and risk career, fortune, and physical safety. For business leaders, these narratives are more than entertainment; they mirror the pressure points of real life: when a superior suggests “we all know how this is supposed to come out,” when a customer insists “everyone else does it,” or when power signals that legality is an obstacle, not a boundary.
None of the protagonists in these films is asked to make a hard decision in a vacuum. They operate in organizations that reward loyalty, defer to power and whisper that the larger “cause” justifies the shortcut. That is what makes these stories so useful today. A senator in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, a judge in Judgment at Nuremberg, a publisher in The Post, a whistleblower in Silkwood or Dark Waters: each is surrounded by colleagues who urge accommodation, delay or silence. Each must decide whether professional identity is primarily about serving the powerful or about preserving the conditions under which law can remain something more than a set of tools for the already strong.
Business leaders and advisors occupy a special position in this landscape. The law does not merely regulate organizations; it runs through them; through decisions, signatures, reporting lines and incentives. When professionals bless an unlawful scheme with clever drafting, or remain mute in the face of obvious illegality, the damage extends beyond a single deal, quarter or company. It teaches executives, officeholders and citizens that “the law” is infinitely malleable, that there is always a workaround if one hires the right people. Conversely, when leaders refuse, escalate, advise against or resign rather than cross a clear line, they send the opposite message: that there is a bedrock of legality beneath politics and personality that cannot be bought, bullied, or spun away.
Taken together, the fifty films in this list invite professionals to imagine themselves not as passive technicians but as consequential actors whose choices shape whether the Rule of Law remains a governing principle or degenerates into a slogan. Some of the characters succeed; others fail. Some pay dearly for their integrity; others evade consequences after betraying it. But in every case, the story turns on a recognizably professional decision: Will I lend my skills to this? Will I stand up in this room, at this moment, and say that what is being demanded violates the law and cannot be done in my name?
Business audiences do not need a speech about current events to feel the force of those questions. They need only admit that, like the characters on screen, they may one day have to keep their principles when keeping them hurts.
Here is a list of 50 American films centered on protagonists who must make hard moral choices at grave personal, financial or reputational risk.
Full Disclosure: The list and synopses below were generated using artificial intelligence.
Legal Dramas and the Rule of Law
- To Kill a Mockingbird (1962)
Atticus Finch knowingly endangers his safety and standing in a racist community by defending an innocent Black man, embodying courage in applying law against inflamed public opinion and mob pressure.
- 12 Angry Men (1957)
Juror #8 risks alienation and scorn from the entire panel by insisting on genuine deliberation and testing the evidence, reminding us that the Rule of Law is only as strong as the individual’s willingness to give “reasonable doubt” real meaning, not mere rhetoric.
- A Few Good Men (1992)
Lt. Kaffee chooses to pursue the chain of command up to a powerful colonel, risking his career to expose unlawful orders and the abuse of “national security” as a shield against accountability.
- …And Justice for All (1979)
Arthur Kirkland must decide whether to sabotage his own client—the very judge who previously warped procedure—to reveal systemic injustice, dramatizing the collision between client loyalty and a lawyer’s obligation to the integrity of the system.
- Michael Clayton (2007)
A law firm fixer confronts his complicity in corporate wrongdoing and risks his life and livelihood by turning on a client whose resources vastly outstrip his own, demonstrating that there is no “safe” middle ground when “practical” compromises slide into ethical collapse.
- The Verdict (1982)
A broken plaintiff’s lawyer rejects an easy settlement and chooses a risky trial in a medical malpractice case, gambling his remaining professional capital on telling the truth about institutional negligence.
- A Time to Kill (1996)
Jake Brigance defends a man who killed his daughter’s assailants in a racially explosive Mississippi town, risking his family’s safety and his own future to insist that the jury see the humanity of both client and victim.
- The Lincoln Lawyer (2011)
Mickey Haller discovers his wealthy client is guilty and tied to an old wrongful conviction, forcing him to navigate privilege, confidentiality, and justice in ways that push the limits of professional responsibility doctrine.
- The Rainmaker (1997)
A young solo practitioner takes on a powerful insurer that denied coverage to a dying client, choosing to fight despite procedural disadvantages and personal risk in order to expose systemic bad faith practices.
- Erin Brockovich (2000)
A non-lawyer legal assistant pushes a law firm to confront industrial pollution by a major utility, risking financial ruin and burnout in pursuit of redress for an entire town poisoned by toxic water.
- My Cousin Vinny (1992)
An inexperienced lawyer refuses to plead out his cousins’ capital case despite local hostility, challenging small town norms and judicial impatience to insist on evidentiary rigor and genuine adversarial testing.
- Philadelphia (1993)
A homophobic attorney overcomes his own bias to represent a wrongfully terminated partner with AIDS, risking his reputation and client base to vindicate anti discrimination principles in the face of stigma and fear.
- The Client (1994)
A solo lawyer defends a vulnerable child against both federal prosecutors and organized crime, risking her own safety and professional standing to preserve the client’s agency and confidentiality.
- The Conspirator (2010)
A Union lawyer defends Mary Surratt in the Lincoln assassination trials, accepting professional ostracism to challenge the use of military tribunals and the erosion of due process in times of national trauma.
- Bridge of Spies (2015)
An insurance lawyer accepts appointment to represent an accused Soviet spy, enduring public hostility and official pressure to deliver only a “token defense,” and later risks his life negotiating a prisoner swap grounded in legal principle, proving that the Rule of Law must apply even to those the public hates most.
- Judgment at Nuremberg (1961)
An American judge tries Nazi jurists and must resist political pressure to soften accountability for the sake of Cold War alliances, dramatizing the idea that judges cannot outsource conscience to “orders” or geopolitical expedience.
- The Insider (1999)
A corporate scientist whistleblower and a journalist confront legal intimidation and confidentiality constraints to expose tobacco industry fraud, highlighting lawyers’ roles either as silencers or enablers of public truth.
- A Civil Action (1998)
A plaintiffs’ attorney stakes his firm’s finances and his own solvency on a toxic tort case against deep pocketed defendants, forcing a reckoning between litigation as business and litigation as moral calling.
- The Judge (2014)
A big city defense attorney returns home to defend his estranged father, a judge accused of murder, and must decide whether to expose exculpatory but reputation destroying truths to meet his ethical duties.
- Reasonable Doubt (2014)
A prosecutor involved in a hit and run confronts the moral and professional consequences when another man is charged with the crime, forcing a choice between protecting a career and correcting a wrongful prosecution.
Public Service, Office and Conscience
- Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939)
A naïve senator refuses to yield to party bosses and corrupt interests, risking expulsion and national humiliation through a filibuster to defend the integrity of democratic institutions.
- All the President’s Men (1976)
Two reporters, backed by lawyers and editors, persist in investigating Watergate despite legal threats and career risks, emphasizing the symbiotic roles of a free press and a legal order grounded in accountability.
- Spotlight (2015)
An investigative team confronts their publication’s own past complicity while exposing systemic abuse by a powerful church, balancing defamation risk and institutional self interest against the imperative of public justice.
- Serpico (1973)
An honest NYPD officer exposes endemic corruption, suffering ostracism and mortal danger for refusing to participate in unlawful practices, mirroring the lonely path of whistleblowers inside legal systems.
- On the Waterfront (1954)
A dockworker must decide whether to testify against corrupt union bosses who can destroy him, highlighting witness intimidation dynamics that lawyers confront when seeking truthful testimony.
- High Noon (1952)
A town marshal is abandoned by citizens he protected and must decide whether to face returning killers alone or flee, illustrating how rule of law institutions fail when courage is outsourced to “someone else.”
- Lincoln (2012)
Abraham Lincoln and his allies weigh procedural shortcuts and political horse trading against the necessity of enacting the Thirteenth Amendment, foregrounding tensions between moral ends and legal means.
- The Post (2017)
The publisher and lawyers of a major newspaper decide whether to publish the Pentagon Papers in defiance of government pressure, risking injunctions, criminal exposure, and corporate ruin to defend First Amendment values. Lawyers and leaders risk corporate ruin to defend the principle that the law is a boundary for the government, not a tool for its convenience.
- Thirteen Days (2000)
Civilian leaders and advisors confront military pressure during the Cuban Missile Crisis, choosing precarious diplomacy over seemingly “clean” military options, underscoring civilian control and legality in national security decisions.
- The Contender (2000)
A vice presidential nominee refuses to defend herself with compromising disclosures that would violate others’ privacy, risking confirmation to preserve principle in the face of a scorched earth confirmation process.
Corporate, Financial and Professional Ethics
- Margin Call (2011)
A junior risk analyst and senior executives discover a catastrophic exposure in a financial firm and must decide whether to dump toxic assets on unsuspecting counterparties, dramatizing collective responsibility for systemic harm.
- Wall Street (1987)
An ambitious young broker is seduced by insider trading and must choose between loyalty to a mentor and loyalty to the law, illustrating how professional culture can normalize fraud until individuals draw their own ethical line.
- The Big Short (2015)
Outsiders who see the housing bubble’s collapse wrestle with whether to merely profit from it or also warn institutions and the public, forcing reflection on exploitation versus stewardship when one understands systemic risk.
- Boiler Room (2000)
A college dropout entangled in a pump and dump brokerage must decide whether to cooperate with regulators at the cost of personal freedom and family expectations, highlighting the personal consequences of white collar whistleblowing.
- Thank You for Smoking (2005)
A charismatic lobbyist defends tobacco in public while grappling with the example he sets for his son, embodying tensions between client advocacy, spin, and truth in a First Amendment rich but ethically fraught profession.
- Up in the Air (2009)
A corporate downsizing consultant starts questioning his role in terminating workers on behalf of distant executives, illustrating how “just doing my job” can erode empathy and moral agency.
- Silkwood (1983)
A nuclear plant worker investigates safety violations and faces harassment, legal pressure, and lethal danger, exemplifying how individuals in regulated industries bear the burden when institutions fail to police themselves.
- Dark Waters (2019)
A defense side environmental lawyer turns against a major chemical client after discovering decades of contamination, sacrificing career and financial stability to pursue a grueling, years long mass tort case.
- Norma Rae (1979)
A textile worker becomes a union organizer despite employer retaliation and community backlash, centering the moral choice to organize and assert rights even when law is weak and enforcement captured.
- The China Syndrome (1979)
A TV reporter and plant insiders expose a near meltdown at a nuclear facility, confronting legal threats and corporate pressure that encourage silence over safety and truth.
War, Security and Personal Sacrifice
- Paths of Glory (1957)
A French officer defies superiors to defend soldiers charged with cowardice, confronting a sham court martial process that uses executions to mask command failures, raising questions about obedience versus justice in wartime law.
- Saving Private Ryan (1998)
A squad is ordered to risk many lives for one man, and the commanding officer must continually weigh the legality and morality of sacrificial orders where human life is reduced to strategic calculus.
- The Hurt Locker (2008)
An explosive ordnance technician repeatedly chooses extreme personal risk in Iraq, forcing viewers to ask whether courage, addiction to danger, or institutional expectations drive decisions under the laws of armed conflict.
- Rules of Engagement (2000)
A Marine colonel faces court martial over a deadly embassy incident, and his defense counsel must parse conflicting evidence and political pressures to draw a line between lawful orders and war crimes.
- Glory (1989)
Officers and soldiers in the first all Black Union regiment confront unequal pay and suicidal missions, deciding whether to accept unjust conditions or demand lawful equality even at extreme peril.
Personal Conscience, Community and Criminal Law
- Do the Right Thing (1989)
A Brooklyn neighborhood erupts in racial tension, and a central character faces a decision that will define his moral legacy in the community, foregrounding questions of lawful protest, property, and life.
- Mystic River (2003)
A former convict and a local police detective navigate a murder investigation shaped by childhood trauma, culminating in vigilante “justice” that raises hard questions about proof, vengeance, and irreversible choices.
- The Shawshank Redemption (1994)
An innocent man in prison maintains hope and dignity, ultimately choosing an audacious escape that exposes institutional corruption, prompting lawyers to reflect on what happens when legal avenues fail utterly.
- Dead Man Walking (1995)
A nun serves as spiritual counselor to a condemned murderer and must advocate for his humanity without denying his crimes, paralleling the defense lawyer’s task of upholding dignity within a system of retribution.
- Winter’s Bone (2010)
A teenage girl in the Ozarks must either betray her criminal relatives to the law or lose her family home, embodying the brutal conflict between kinship loyalty, survival, and cooperation with legal authorities.
==========================
Bruce M. Hennes is CEO of Hennes Communications, a Chambers-ranked crisis firm. He has been a member of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association’s Board of Directors for 19 years (17 years as a member of the Executive Committee) and twice a recipient of that bar association’s Presidents Award. He is not an attorney.
To browse back issues of the firm’s award-winning Crisis Communications Today newsletter or to subscribe, click here.
